But is Osama really dead? Was he killed on May 1st by a few American navy seals like Obama claims? And was he really responsible for the 9/11 attacks? Well let us start from the beginning:
For a long time, the United States had a problem. It needed to introduce anti-terrorism laws, but there was no real terrorism. That is, until the year 1995. On April 19, a building in Oklahoma city was gutted by explosions. The authorities quickly fingered a man, Timothy McVeigh, who they said wasn't working alone. They claimed that he blew up the building by parking a van filled with explosives right outside. That is the official report. What people didn't hear about is that there was 2 more explosives inside the building. The second one went off, and the third one was diffused.
Oklahoma City Bombings
When a truck explodes outside a building, the building is supposed to implode, but in this case it did not. As you can see from the picture above, the building actually exploded. Also, when a van explodes, there must be remains of an engine or the exterior body, but there was none. Eventually, a CIA agent jogging 4 blocks away happened to find the axel of the truck. How did they know it was from the same truck? They claimed that the registration number was on it. But have you ever heard of a registration number being on an axel?
Of course no further investigation took place because a firm got the contract and gutted the building before anyone could look into it. Within 5 days, the U.S. had anti-terrorism legislation. That gave the president of the U.S. power to suspend the constitution. But, it did not give the U.S. any power to enter any country in the world.
Fast forward to that fateful day, 9/11/2001. Two planes went into the twin towers of the World Trade Center and the world watched in shock and fear as both buildings collapsed. Immediately, the news reports started live coverage of what was happening in New York. And for people who were watching closely, it became obvious that there was secondary explosive devices in the buildings.
Building 7 was a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper, occupying a city block north of the World Trade Center. It was 300 ft. away from the two buildings that collapsed. The CIA was supposed to be in there but they had evacuated the building. 8 hours later, the building collapsed but nothing had hit it. The government and the media blamed its collapse on fires inside it. A steel framed high-rise collapsing because of small fires inside it?
As you can see from the pictures above, the collapse of building 7 has all the characteristics of a controlled demolition. The collapse was vertical, the building imploded, and minimal damage was caused to the buildings around it. The collapse of Building 7 destroyed thousands of SEC case files of ongoing investigations into companies such as WorldCom. An even more chilling reality is that prior knowledge evidence surfaced. Watch the video below:
Of course while all this was happening, the U.S. government had already figured out who was responsible for it, Osama Bin Laden. Or more accurately, Al-Queda extremists under the instruction of Osama Bin Laden. I will get into the case of Osama Bin Laden further down in the post but for now, let's focus on the people that actually carried out the attacks.
According to official reports, the leader of the group of terrorists was a man by the name of Atta. As soon as the names of the terrorists were released, 5 of these men came forward saying that they were in fact alive and well and going on with their normal lives in different countries. They couldn't have possibly been on the plane.
The next question was, how did they know that Atta was the mastermind? Well, he had written a suicide note and placed it in his suitcase. It must have slipped his mind though, because when he got to the airport, he handed in the suitcase. But in a twist of fate, his luggage was the only luggage that never made it to the plane. Interesting. Why would a suicide bomber pack a bag? Why would a suicide bomber write a suicide note? Why would he place said note in said luggage if he knew it was all going to burn away?
To make things even better for the US government, his passport had magically fell out of the plane debris, unharmed, and identified him.
The government kept finding things to help pin those men. They also found a copy of the Koran in a taxi, and a airplane flying manual. They said it was left by one of the terrorists.
A few other strange things: both the black boxes were missing. Also, 3 days before 9/11, the shares in the airlines were sold, and the turnover was like never before.
Then there was the case of Delmart Edward Vreeland, a man imprisoned in Canada. He had been arrested for gambling. In prison, he claimed that he was a CIA agent, and was undercover and investigating at the time of his arrest. The CIA was embarrassed by this and denied him. So, he wrote a letter before 9/11 occurred saying an aircraft was going to fly into the twin towers and to the pentagon.
The Pentagon
Look at this picture. Could a huge plane hit only the first floor of the Pentagon?
Now really look at it. Does that hole look big enough for the plane to have did that damage? Do you see a plane? Do you see any plane parts? Do you see any dead bodies? Do you see any luggage? The answer is no. There was no plane, no debris, no bodies, no luggage, and, like the case in the World Trade Center, no black boxes.
Did the wings just disappear?
The case of the pentagon was very strange for one specific reason. Eye witnesses said that they saw an airplane hovering 25 feet above the ground at 300 miles per hour. Then the plane went (poof), and they heard an explosion, and there it was: a big hole in the pentagon. But where was the plane? I believe that there was never a plane. A missile was shot at the pentagon, and it was disguised as a plane with a new technology that the army has been using for a while, holography.
Can you see the exit hole?
Holography is a technique that allows the light scattered from an object to be recorded and later reconstructed so that when an imaging system (a camera or an "eye") is placed in the reconstructed beam, an image of the object will be seen even when the object is no longer present (I will go more into holograms and their use in deceiving people in my next post).
CNN using this new hologram technology
Flight 93 also had terrorists on board. The terrorists were trying to hijack that plane as well, but were overcome by loyal citizens. The plane crashed in an empty field in Pennsylvania, and made a huge hole in the ground.
As in the case of the pentagon plane, there was no aircraft debris, no bodies, no luggage, and of course, no black box. It was later revealed that during the flight, a phone call was made between the air craft and the pentagon. They said that the phone call was made with a cell phone. Upon further investigation, people figured out that there was no record of that cell phone call. So, the pentagon back tracked and said that the phone call actually didn't come from a cell phone, but from a plane phone. When you make a phone call from a plane phone, you need to swipe a credit card. But further investigation revealed that there was no record of a credit card transaction. So, once again the pentagon back tracked and claimed that it was made as a collect call. But then again, further investigation revealed that you can not make a collect call from a plane phone. The story died there.
Osama Bin Laden
He release two videos in September and October of 2001. In those videos he looked very pale and sick. It was reported that he had kidney failure and was very sick. He had even previously ordered a dialysis machine to be delivered to Afghanistan. (Must have been hard for him to get dialysis in the caves, being on the move all the time and trying to generate electricity).
Osama shown looking very sick and pale
Nose job?
How is this possible? Does it make any sense? It does. They are using doubles, and have been using doubles ever since for these videos. And this is not the first time this has been done. Remember Saddam Hussein?
Saddam Hussain was the last Iraq president before the U.S. invasion in 2003. Immediately after, he disappeared and for weeks his whereabouts were a mystery. Weeks turned into months, and finally in December of 2003, almost 8 months later, Saddam Hussain was captured. Or was he? Take a look at this picture:
That is what we knew Saddam Hussain to look like for all his life
This was supposed to be Saddam in 2003 addressing his top people about the war. Finally, take a look at this picture, showing him when he was captured only a few months later:
Does it not seem suspicious that this man, who has never had a beard in his life, grew a magnificent beard in such a short amount of time?
In the weeks after his death, a lot of reports about a possible Saddam double came out. Does it make sense now? On December 26, an egyptian newspaper, AlWafd, released the following story:
The story claims that Osama had died in mid December of kidney failure, and was buried in an unmarked grave, according to Wahabi tradition. The story featured a Taliban leader who said he attended his funeral, and saw his corpsed face. He said that the funeral was attended by 30 of Al-Queda men, alongside friends and family.
After that, a lot of high ranking people came out and said that Osama is dead. US foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M Codevilla said: "All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than bin Laden." The Pakistani president, Pervez Musharraf also came out and said that Osama is probably dead. Not only that, the Afghani president, Hamid Karzai also came out and said the Osama is probably dead. And finally Benazir Bhutto, who was the prime minister of Pakistan was doing an interview live on the BBC, and during that interview she mentioned that Osama bin Laden was dead.
She later retracted the story and said that it just slipped. And a few months later, she was assassinated.
All this brings us to one obvious question, if Osama has been dead for almost 10 years, why did we not know about this? The answer is simple. To keep the war on terror going. The united states is getting billions and billions of dollars in tax money to fund the war on terror. The next logical question would be, why would they release that information now? Well, what was the immediate reaction to the news? "Obama got Osama". People are practically worshiping Obama right now. His re-election looks very plausible right now. He is a puppet and he is fulfilling his purpose greatly.
So, what is the point of all this? I am not trying to convince anybody of anything. This information is all out there, my purpose was to lay it out for you, and you make your own decision. But maybe, just maybe, we are being lied to. What do you think?
Further reading:
JUSTIFY'S THEORY:
The Occult Connection
We all know that the occult uses these events in history to follow a satanic agenda. Aside from Obama solidifying his election for 2012 with such an undeserving success of defeating terror, one would assume that there is always something more sinister a foot. What most people may not know is that the date in which Osama had claimed to have been killed is also shared with another greatly despised character in world history.
Adolf Hitler, contrary to his rumored death on April 30th, was officially pronounced dead on May 1st. This seems very mysterious considering that two of the most hated men in history would share the same death date. I have said in many previous posts that the occult focuses greatly on numerology, specifically in relation to their rituals. Well this is no different. Hitler died on the same day in 1945. That was approximately 66 years ago. May 1st, if added by its calendar numerical value is also 6 (5 + 1). On the date of May 1st, the occult managed to get everyone to celebrate someones death in mass occasion.
The reason why this is so troubling is because, May 1st is considered one of the most sacred days in the occult where they celebrate the highly satanic Beltane Festival. The Beltane Festival is filled many dark rituals including orgy and human sacrifice.
The infamous "Wicker Man" ritual is implemented during this festival where a human sacrifice is burned alive on a statue made of wood. Interesting enough, occult Hollywood has been very persistant in making people accustomed to this idea of the festival and their "Wicker Man" ritual as they have made a movie about it twice:
What's interesting about this is that the 2006 re-make acquired Nicolas Cage for its leading role as the detective investigating the Beltane Festival:
Cage seen being sacrificed by the festival's participators
As I have showed you many times, these occult actors choose many of these roles on purpose to further their success and continually push the satanic agenda. What is this movies relation to Osama and the World Trade Center you ask? Well Cage also appeared in another 2006 movie, care to guess what it was?
You have read this article with the title The Lie On Terror: Truth About Osama's Death & 9/11. You can bookmark this page URL https://truehiphopspot.blogspot.com/2011/05/the-lie-on-terror-truth-about-osama.html. Thanks!